Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Aging
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Flannelly, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Quantity and Quality of Research on Religion and Spirituality in Four Major Gerontology Journals Between 1985 and 2002

Andrew J. Weaver

The HealthCare Chaplaincy

Laura T. Flannelly

University of Hawaii

Adrienne L. Strock

The HealthCare Chaplaincy

Neal Krause

University of Michigan

Kevin J. Flannelly

The HealthCare Chaplaincy

The study examines the quantity and quality of research on religion published in four gerontological journals between 1985 and 2002. The percentage of studies that addressed religion increased significantly over time, especially in The Gerontologist and Research on Aging. The research quality of studies on religion also increased significantly over time. However, the measurement of religion and spirituality did not improve across time. The quality of religious measures used and other criteria of methodological and theoretical sophistication differed significantly between studies in which religion was the major research focus and those in which it was only a minor focus. The most important methodological improvement was the increased use of repeated measures designs, whereas the most important theoretical improvement was the increased use of hypothesis testing. Procedures and criteria for assessing the methodological and theoretical sophistication of a field are discussed.

Key Words: measurement • methodology • religion • spirituality • research sophistication

Research on Aging, Vol. 27, No. 2, 119-135 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0164027504270476


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
K. Hank and B. Schaan
Cross-National Variations in the Correlation Between Frequency of Prayer and Health Among Older Europeans
Research on Aging, January 1, 2008; 30(1): 36 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
Y. Jang, A. R. Borenstein, D. A. Chiriboga, K. Phillips, and J. A. Mortimer
Religiosity, Adherence to Traditional Culture, and Psychological Well-Being Among African American Elders
Journal of Applied Gerontology, November 1, 2006; 25(5): 343 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]