Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Research on Aging
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shuey, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Worker Preferences, Spousal Coordination, and Participation in an Employer-Sponsored Pension Plan

Kim M. Shuey

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, shuey{at}email.unc.edu

Recent changes in the pension environment, such as the growth of defined contribution plans, place more responsibility on individuals for the accumulation of retirement resources and provide workers with an increasing array of pension-related choices and decisions. This study uses data from the Health and Retirement Study to examine two instances where workers face such decisions—participation in an offered defined contribution plan and participation in a supplemental pension plan. The author examines the relationship between two largely unexplored predictors of pension participation—psychological motivators of saving and the influence of spouse’s behavior. Individual preferences for planning and risk and measures of spouse’s pension behavior are included in probit models predicting individual pension participation. Results reveal gender differences in the association between preferences and behavior and differences in the primary versus supplemental decision. They also suggest that spouses coordinate pension decisions and behave similarly within structural constraints.

Key Words: pension behavior • decision-making • spousal coordination • retirement income

Research on Aging, Vol. 26, No. 3, 287-316 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0164027503262476


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
J. D. Wong and M. A. Hardy
Women's Retirement Expectations: How Stable Are They?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, January 28, 2009; (2009) gbn010v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
A. M. O'Rand and K. M. Shuey
Gender and the Devolution of Pension Risks in the US
Current Sociology, March 1, 2007; 55(2): 287 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
K. M. Shuey and A. M. O'Rand
Changing Demographics and New Pension Risks
Research on Aging, May 1, 2006; 28(3): 317 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]