This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bosworth, H. B. Articles by Siegler, I. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Age and Distance to Death in the Seattle Longitudinal Study

Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, hboswort{at}acpub.duke.edu

K. Warner Schaie

Pennsylvania State University

Sherry L. Willis

Pennsylvania State University

Ilene C. Siegler

Duke University

A series of hierarchical regression models was used to determine if time to death was a significant independent variable for level and seven-year change in intellectual performance for 1,214 community-dwelling adults. Distance to death explained a significant amount of the variance of intellectual performance at individuals’last measurement but not of the decline in performance after controlling for age, education, gender, and survivorship. The inclusion of time to death improved the proportion of unique variance explained by about 1% to 3% and between 4% and 10.4% of the total variance explained. Decedents had lower levels of verbal meaning, spatial ability, reasoning ability, and psychomotor speed at last measurements and greater amounts of seven-year decline on verbal meaning and psychomotor speed. The inclusion of distance to death may help improve the explanation of variability in performance associated with increased age.

Research on Aging, Vol. 21, No. 6, 723-738 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0164027599216001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Karlamangla, D. Miller-Martinez, C. S. Aneshensel, T. E. Seeman, R. G. Wight, and J. Chodosh Trajectories of Cognitive Function in Late Life in the United States: Demographic and Socioeconomic Predictors Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2009; 170(3): 331 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Ziegelmann, S. Lippke, and R. Schwarzer Subjective residual life expectancy in health self-regulation. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2006; 61(4): P195 - P201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Hassing, B. Johansson, S. Berg, S. E. Nilsson, N. L. Pedersen, S. M. Hofer, and G. McClearn Terminal Decline and Markers of Cerebro- and Cardiovascular Disease: Findings From a Longitudinal Study of the Oldest Old J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2002; 57(3): P268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. W. Schaie The impact of longitudinal studies on understanding development from young adulthood to old age International Journal of Behavioral Development, September 1, 2000; 24(3): 257 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]