This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Herzog, A. R. Articles by Morgan, J. N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Age and Gender Differences in the Value of Productive Activities

Four Different Approaches

University of Michigan

James N. Morgan

University of Michigan

The definition of personal productivity based on paid work is expanded to include many forms of unpaid work. The productivity of these forms of unpaid work is estimated empirically, using several economic approaches (an opportunity cost approach, a market price approach, and a value-added approach) and one noneconomic approach. Additionally, two methods of dealing with selection bias when estimating opportunity costs for nonemployed persons are compared. These different approaches all document the extent to which many of the activities (such as housework, formal volunteer work, or informal help to relatives and friends) that are often performed without pay by older Americans or women are actually productive because they produce goods and services to which a market value can be imputed. Using this expanded definition to describe the productive contribution of men and women at different ages provides a much needed correction to existing social statistics: Women contribute in major ways to U.S. productivity, as do older adults, although to a lesser degree. These findings challenge the stereotypic view of older Americans as unproductive and mere burdens on society. Data were from a 1986 cross-sectional survey of 3,617 adults representative of those 25 years old and older living in the coterminous United States.

Research on Aging, Vol. 14, No. 2, 169-198 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0164027592142002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Felmlee and A. Muraco Gender and Friendship Norms Among Older Adults Research on Aging, May 1, 2009; 31(3): 318 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Sugihara, H. Sugisawa, H. Shibata, and K. Harada Productive Roles, Gender, and Depressive Symptoms: Evidence From a National Longitudinal Study of Late-Middle-Aged Japanese J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2008; 63(4): P227 - P234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Klumb and H. Maier Daily Activities and Survival at Older Ages J Aging Health, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 594 - 611. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Hinterlong, N. Morrow-Howell, and P. A. Rozario Productive Engagement and Late Life Physical and Mental Health: Findings from a Nationally Representative Panel Study Research on Aging, July 1, 2007; 29(4): 348 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hank and H. Jurges Gender and the Division of Household Labor in Older Couples: A European Perspective Journal of Family Issues, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 399 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. H. Smith The Rest of the Nonprofit Sector: Grassroots Associations as the Dark Matter Ignored in Prevailing "Flat Earth" Maps of the Sector Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 1997; 26(2): 114 - 131. [Abstract]

				T. N. Taylor, P. H. Davis, J. C. Torner, J. Holmes, J. W. Meyer, and M. F. Jacobson Lifetime Cost of Stroke in the United States Stroke, September 1, 1996; 27(9): 1459 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text]