Research on Aging

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braithwaite, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Research on Aging, Vol. 14, No. 1, 3-27 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0164027592141001
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Caregiving Burden

Making the Concept Scientifically Useful and Policy Relevant

Valerie Braithwaite

Australian National University

This article critically examines the burden concept, its lack of clear definition, the inconsistency between its conceptualization and operationalization, its inappropriate use within the stress paradigm, and its marginal policy relevance. A needs-based conceptualization of burden is presented in which burden is defined in terms of frustration of basic needs arising from five characteristics of family care for frail elderly people: awareness of degeneration, unpredictability, time constraints, the caregiver-receiver relationship, and lack of choice. These contributors to burden are called crises of decline to contrast with the experiences normally encountered through child care. The model has received empirical support and represents a reconceptualization that not only accommodates the increasingly popular stress paradigm but also provides a bridge between research that focuses on burden as an individualistic phenomenon and research that links dominant caregiving practices with social injustice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
J. M Argimon, E. Limon, J. Vila, and C. Cabezas
Health-related quality of life in carers of patients with dementia
Fam. Pract., August 1, 2004; 21(4): 454 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman
Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
M. Thornton and S. S. Travis
Analysis of the Reliability of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2003; 58(2): S127 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
N. O'Rourke and H. A. Tuokko
Psychometric Properties of an Abridged Version of the Zarit Burden Interview Within a Representative Canadian Caregiver Sample
Gerontologist, February 1, 2003; 43(1): 121 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
V. Braithwaite
Contextual or General Stress Outcomes: Making Choices Through Caregiving Appraisals
Gerontologist, December 1, 2000; 40(6): 706 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
M. Clark and K. Huttlinger
Elder Care among Mexican American Families
Clin Nurs Res, February 1, 1998; 7(1): 64 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
V. Braithwaite
Understanding Stress in Informal Caregiving: Is Burden a Problem of the Individual or of Society?
Research on Aging, June 1, 1996; 18(2): 139 - 174.
[Abstract]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
J. B. McKinlay, S. L. Crawford, and S. L. Tennstedt
The Everyday Impacts of Providing Informal Care to Dependent Elders and their Consequences for the Care Recipients
J Aging Health, November 1, 1995; 7(4): 497 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
A. A. Cota, C. R. Evans, K. L. Dion, L. Kilik, and R. S. Longman
The Structure of Group Cohesion
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 1995; 21(6): 572 - 580.
[Abstract]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
D. L. Wagner and G. G. Hunt
The Use of Workplace Eldercare Programs by Employed Caregivers
Research on Aging, March 1, 1994; 16(1): 69 - 84.
[Abstract]