This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0164027509348147v1 32/1/122    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Knodel, J. Articles by Saengtienchai, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Community Reaction to Older Age Parental AIDS Caregivers and Their Families: Evidence From Cambodia

¹ University of Michigan
² Royal University of Phnom Penh
³ Independent social researcher

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jknodel{at}umich.edu.

	Abstract

Accounts of community reactions to persons with HIV/AIDS and their families typically focus only on negative reactions stemming from stigmatization, with little acknowledgement of variation over time and across settings. To usefully guide local interventions, a broader view is needed that also encompasses attitudes and actions stemming from sympathy and friendship. The authors examined community reactions in Cambodia to families from the perspectives of parents of adults who died of AIDS or currently receive antiretroviral therapy. Survey evidence and open-ended interviews revealed a mixture of reactions with respect to social relations, interactions with local officials, gossip, business patronage, funeral participation, and orphaned grandchildren. Positive support was often dominant, and reactions typically improved substantially over time. Misplaced fears of contagion through casual contact underlay most negative reactions. Moral condemnation or blame was not evident as a source of negative reactions. Overall, a sufficiently supportive atmosphere likely exists in many localities to facilitate community-based efforts to mitigate the epidemic’s impact on affected families.

First published on October 8, 2009, doi:10.1177/0164027509348147

Research on Aging 2010;32:122.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2010


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?